Why Most Communication Training Misses the Point (And What Actually Works)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Doodle or Die | Pexels | Medium | Elephantjournal

I was sitting in yet another corporate "communication workshop" last month when the facilitator asked us to practice "active listening" by nodding more vigorously. That's when I realised we've been getting workplace communication training completely backwards for the past two decades.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: most communication training is absolute rubbish because it focuses on techniques instead of understanding. We teach people to smile more, make eye contact, and use "I" statements like they're magic spells. But real communication? That's about reading the room, knowing when to shut up, and understanding that sometimes the best response is no response at all.

After 18 years of running communication workshops across Australia, I've watched countless employees sit through role-playing exercises that make them cringe. They practice delivering feedback to a colleague who's playing the part of being "difficult" while some trainer with a clipboard takes notes. It's like teaching someone to swim by showing them YouTube videos.

The real breakthrough comes when you stop treating communication like a performance and start treating it like actual human connection.

The Empathy Problem Nobody Talks About

Here's what drives me mental: we keep telling people to "be more empathetic" without teaching them how to actually develop empathy. It's like telling someone to "be taller." You can't just decide to understand other people better - it's a skill that requires practice and genuine curiosity about how other humans think.

Most employee communication training I've seen treats empathy like a checkbox exercise. "Step into their shoes" they say, as if everyone's wearing the same size. But understanding your difficult coworker Sarah isn't about imagining what you'd feel in her situation - it's about understanding what she actually feels, which might be completely different.

The best communicators I know aren't the ones with perfect technique. They're the ones who genuinely care about understanding what makes people tick. They ask follow-up questions not because they learned it in a workshop, but because they're actually curious about the answer.

Sarah from accounting doesn't need you to mirror her body language. She needs you to understand that she's been overlooked for three promotions and is considering leaving. That's information you get through genuine conversation, not communication tricks.

Why Australian Workplaces Are Different

Let me be blunt about something that makes me unpopular at industry conferences: Australian workplace culture doesn't always translate well to American communication models. We're more direct, we use humour differently, and we have different tolerance levels for corporate speak.

I've watched perfectly good Melbourne managers try to implement "feedback sandwiches" and end up sounding like robots. The whole "positive, negative, positive" formula feels forced here because Australians generally prefer straight talk. We'd rather someone tell us directly that our report needs work than dress it up in unnecessary pleasantries.

This doesn't mean we should be rude - it means our communication training needs to acknowledge that cultural context matters. What works in corporate America might fall flat in a Brisbane construction company or a Perth mining firm.

The most effective communication training I've delivered has always started with understanding the specific workplace culture first. You can't apply generic solutions to specific environments and expect them to stick.

The Technology Trap

Here's where I might lose some of you, but I genuinely believe that our obsession with digital communication tools is making us worse at actual communication. We've become experts at crafting emails and Slack messages but terrible at reading facial expressions and body language.

I was consulting with a tech startup last year where the entire team sat in an open office but communicated primarily through Slack. They'd message someone sitting three metres away rather than have a conversation. When conflicts arose, they'd escalate them through digital channels where tone gets lost and misunderstandings multiply.

The solution wasn't better digital communication training - it was getting them to talk to each other again.

Don't get me wrong, technology has its place. But when your professional development training focuses more on email etiquette than face-to-face conversation skills, you're solving the wrong problem.

We need to teach people when to pick up the phone instead of sending another email. When to walk over to someone's desk instead of adding to an already confusing group chat. When to call a meeting instead of creating a message thread that goes nowhere.

The Feedback Revolution Nobody Asked For

Every communication training program obsesses over feedback delivery, but here's what actually matters: most feedback doesn't need to be formal at all. The best feedback happens in the moment, naturally, as part of ongoing work relationships.

I used to spend hours teaching managers elaborate feedback frameworks. Then I realised that the most effective feedback I'd ever received was from a colleague who simply said, "That presentation dragged on a bit - maybe hit the key points faster next time?" No framework, no formal structure, just one human helping another improve.

The problem with formal feedback systems is that they turn natural human interaction into a performance. People start preparing for feedback conversations like they're defending a thesis. Recipients get defensive because they know they're being evaluated. The whole thing becomes adversarial when it should be collaborative.

Real feedback happens when someone trusts you enough to tell you the truth and you trust them enough to hear it without getting defensive. You can't train that - you can only create environments where it's safe to happen.

What Actually Works (Based on Real Results)

After years of experimenting with different approaches, here's what I've found actually improves workplace communication:

Start with curiosity, not technique. The best communicators are genuinely interested in understanding other people. They ask questions because they want to know the answers, not because they learned it's good technique. Train people to be curious about their colleagues' perspectives, motivations, and challenges.

Practice with real situations, not role-plays. Instead of artificial scenarios, use actual workplace challenges your team is facing. If there's tension between departments, address it directly. If meetings are unproductive, fix the real meetings rather than practicing fake ones.

Focus on listening for understanding, not listening to respond. Most people are formulating their response while the other person is still talking. Train people to listen with the goal of truly understanding what's being communicated, including what's not being said.

The companies that get this right - like Atlassian and Canva - don't just train communication skills. They create cultures where good communication is valued, modelled, and rewarded.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Difficult People

Here's something that might ruffle feathers: sometimes the "difficult" person in your workplace isn't difficult - they're just incompatible with your communication style. We've created this myth that good communicators can get along with everyone, but that's not realistic or even desirable.

I've worked with teams where personality conflicts were treated as communication failures that needed fixing. Sometimes they do. But sometimes Sarah from finance and Dave from marketing just don't mesh, and that's okay. The goal isn't universal harmony - it's functional professional relationships.

Teaching people to recognise when someone genuinely isn't compatible with their style is just as important as teaching them to adapt. You don't need to be best friends with everyone you work with. You just need to work together effectively.

The Real ROI of Communication Training

Companies love asking about return on investment for communication training, and honestly, it's one of the hardest things to measure directly. How do you quantify fewer misunderstandings? How do you calculate the value of improved team morale?

But here's what I've observed in organisations that invest properly in communication development: projects finish on time more often, employee turnover drops, and customer satisfaction improves. Not because people suddenly started using perfect grammar or remembering to make eye contact, but because they started understanding each other better.

The companies that see real results don't treat communication training as a one-off workshop. They integrate it into ongoing management development, team building activities, and performance discussions. It becomes part of how they operate, not something they do once and forget about.

Moving Forward

Look, I'm not saying all communication training is worthless. I'm saying most of it focuses on the wrong things. We need to stop teaching people to perform communication and start helping them actually connect with their colleagues.

The future of workplace communication isn't about better techniques - it's about creating environments where authentic, productive conversation can happen naturally. Where people feel safe to disagree, ask stupid questions, and admit when they don't understand something.

If you're responsible for communication training in your organisation, start by asking what's actually preventing good communication in your specific workplace. Is it lack of technique, or is it lack of trust? Is it poor skills, or is it a culture that punishes honest conversation?

Fix the real problem, not the imaginary one.

Because at the end of the day, communication isn't a skill you master once and keep forever. It's an ongoing practice of trying to understand and be understood by other humans who are just as complicated and contradictory as you are.

And that's both the challenge and the beauty of it.